EJP to M.P. on the Difference between the “Rapture” and the “Appearing”
Imminent Appearing of Christ for the Bodies of His Church
Dear M.P.,
The Jesuit “rapture” heresy (the term “rapture” derived from Jerome’s Latin Vulgate Latin root “raptora”) teaches that since the coming of Christ for his Church to take her out of the world before the judgment of the world (70th week of Daniel—of which Jesuits Lacunza and Ribera knew nothing), we can do and should do nothing in the political arena in resisting evil. I suffered with this damnable heresy all throughout both Bible colleges attended from 1977 to 1981. Further, the Jesuit “rapture” heresy teaches that the coming Antichrist is not the Pope but another military man of European power. Some thought him to be Napoleon or Hitler in the past. But the jest of the doctrine is to take the believer’s eyes off the Jesuit Papacy and to not resist Jesuit intrigue in the political arena—resist as did the great and fearless Calvinistic Puritans. This doctrine was launched to neutralize the Puritans (the foremost enemies of the Society of Jesus on earth at the time) as well as other Protestants so they would no longer take to the halls of legislative power or the battlefields in order to resist the great Jesuit Conspiracy for world government under the Pope.
BUT the Biblical doctrine of the “appearing” of Christ for the bodies of his Church, also called “the day of redemption,” purifies the believer even as He is pure (I John 3). For this “appearing” (Titus 2:13) is imminent (any moment) and is prior to the beginning of the 70th Week of Daniel (Daniel 9:27; Romans 5:9; I Thess. 1:10; 5:9), the last half of that seven-year period being the Great Tribulation (Matt. 24:15). Meanwhile, this doctrine keeps the believer’s eye on Rome knowing that the Papacy is the dynasty of the Antichrist (as Ian Paisley rightly taught), that every Pope is an Antichrist (as all the Reformers taught) and that the final Pope (the seventh Roman Caesar of Revelation 17:10) will be murdered to then rise from the dead to be “that man of sin” (II Thess. 2:3), the Antichrist (I John 2:18; 4:3), the Man-Beast with the number “666? (Revelation 13:3-10, 18). Thus, the true doctrine of the momentary “appearing” of Christ believed by the true Church from the first century keeps the believer’s eye on Rome as the font of all spiritual evil and political corruption while politically and militarily resisting the designs of the Papacy to reduce all nations to the Temporal Power of the Pope—the final Pope of Jesuit making.
See the difference?
Lord Bless,
Brother Eric
Can you now breakdown the difference between the Jesuit rapture and biblical translation or appearing.
Thank you.
M.P.